Chantix Lawsuit: Chantix Class Action Lawsuit

Chantix Class Action Lawsuit: The US FDA is becoming increasingly worried about the increasing number of serious Chantix related lawsuits made against the drug. As a result of these lawsuits, many current smokers who turned to Chantix in order to wean themselves off of cigarettes have recently joined a wave of national lawsuits filed before a single federal court. Chantix lawsuits are based on many different factors, which include the design and composition of the drug, adverse reactions reported by users, and the dangers of these drugs pose to non-smokers. Most significantly however, is that a great number of Chantix lawsuits have been brought against the dietary supplement industry, primarily due to the fact that Chantix is being offered as a prescription supplement.

Chantix is marketed as a prescription smoking cessation medication.

It is a relatively new addition to the treatment of nicotine addiction, having been approved in 1981. One of its unique characteristics is that it causes less of a withdrawal symptom when used over a longer period of time, meaning that Chantix users may continue to use the product without showing the associated withdrawal symptoms. This unique aspect has attracted a great deal of attention from both the manufacturer of Chantix itself, GlaxoSmithKline, and the lawsuit plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Chantix lawsuits argue that the manufacturer of Chantix, GlaxoSmithKline, is responsible for negligence by failing to warn consumers that Chantix is a potentially addictive drug and that if continued long enough can cause serious health issues including respiratory failure, cardiovascular collapse, as well as psychiatric disorders such as depression or psychosis.

Chantix lawsuit defendants counter that there is no evidence linking their product to such illnesses, and that the potential for Chantix abuse or addiction cannot be established. Essentially, the argument goes on, the FDA is powerless to remove a chemical as a prescription medication once it has been approved for sale. If Chantix was banned, the Chantix manufacturers argue, they would lose the huge profits they make from the sale of the drug, a point that drug makers and the FDA have acknowledged.

As one Chantix lawsuit plaintiff states, “I want to stop the lawsuit before it ends so I can rest my weary eyes and my family will be protected.

” Another lawsuit plaintiff says, “My son told me that he’d like to sue GlaxoSmithKline because he killed his friend. He said that he took Chantix for about an hour and his friend died right then and there. I want justice for my son.” Chantix lawsuits are not usually won due to the defendant’s inability to demonstrate that the product is unsafe, but rather because the FDA fails to regulate drugs sold under the Food Drug and Administration (FDA) act.

A few recent Chantix lawsuits were brought against GlaxoSmithKline, the company that produces Chantix.

According to the lawsuits, GlaxoSmithKline did not instruct its Chantix distributors to closely monitor use of the drug, thus causing accidental or severe physical injury to patients. In addition, GlaxoSmithKline did not warn Chantix users that chantix can cause the serious condition of suicidal urges. Chantix distributors also were instructed to lie about the risks of using chantix in order to encourage more use by clients. This caused many clients to become seriously injured or to attempt suicide.

Other lawsuits were brought against GlaxoSmithKline, which settled with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount.

However, some plaintiffs’ attorneys say that the settlement amounts are too small to pay for their client’s losses and for the expenses they incur. Many people who have suffered from Chantix-related injuries say that they would never again use Chantix, a fact the manufacturers are well aware. It is imperative that people who believe they may be suffering Chantix-related injuries to contact a qualified and experienced drug attorney. An experienced attorney can assess your case and determine whether you have a valid case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *